[yocto-ab] Form submission from: Yocto Project Compatible Registration

Richard Purdie richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org
Mon Feb 18 15:06:49 PST 2013


On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 10:54 -0800, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 02/16/2013 07:03 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > Just to explain this, we treat Poky as the reference code for the
> > project which we use for testing. I'm hearing people telling others that
> > Poky isn't YP Compatible which is going to lead to confusion.
> > 
> > As our reference/testing code base, Poky should model best practises so
> > I think it deserves this status. I just want to make it official, clear
> > and head off this issue. I'm hoping this isn't a hard decision for the
> > AB :)
> 
> Well, as far as best practices, the blurring of distro and bsp in
> meta-yocto is something I would argue against in all other layers,
> except meta-yocto :)
> 
> But, OpenEmbedded knows you are trying really hard and votes yes.

The distro and bsp components were separated out into two separate
layers (meta-yocto and meta-yocto-bsp) quite a while ago so this should
be resolved now...

Cheers,

Richard




More information about the yocto-ab mailing list