[yocto-ab] VOTE: Intel BSPs for YP Compatible status

[Osier-mixon, Jeffrey]

Yes, exactly. Procedurally, in this case, there could have been one
single application for "meta-intel BSPs", and in the Explanation box
there could be a list of all of the individual BSPs to be covered by
the Compatible status.

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Ricci, Davide
<Davide.Ricci at windriver.com> wrote:
> I think there are two things we need to preserve:
>
> 1. make sure the approval process is not overwhelming
>
> 2. give visibility of the number of BSPs, or subcomponents in general, which achieve compatibility status, since the interoperability is achieved at the subcomponent level, and users might be interested to know what it is supposed to be interoperable
>
> So, maybe, it'd be nice to have a bulk registration, provided the components which are part of the bundle which would achieve compatibility are listed in a README, maybe, and listed onto the website as separate YP compatible entities?
>
> D
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org [yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org] on behalf of Osier-mixon, Jeffrey [jeffrey.osier-mixon at intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 1:38 PM
> To: Daniel Stenberg
> Cc: yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [yocto-ab] VOTE: Intel BSPs for YP Compatible status
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Daniel Stenberg
> <daniel.stenberg at enea.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, Osier-mixon, Jeffrey wrote:
>>
>>> For layer releases, I wonder if it would make sense to allow a
>>> maintainer to cite the layer itself as the project and then list
>>> individual BSPs or features in the notes. Would that make sense to
>>> everyone, or would you rather approve BSPs individually?
>>
>>
>> I would approve of ways that reduce the amount of registration requests, so
>> I would indeed like to see the layer as as project worthy of a registration
>> instead of single BSPs within it.
>>
>> And to be honest, it wasn't very clear (to me) in the registration emails
>> from Intel just now that this was what was going on...
>
> Thanks, Daniel - I agree, it was unclear, and when we set the process
> up this summer I don't think we really anticipated that each BSP would
> have to be entered individually. If the rest of the members are agreed
> that bulk registration is desirable for layers with a lot of features,
> I'll write up some guidelines and send them around for discussion.
>
>>
>>  / Daniel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Osier-Mixon http://jefro.net/blog
> Yocto Project Community Manager @Intel http://yoctoproject.org
> _______________________________________________
> yocto-ab mailing list
> yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto-ab



-- 
Jeff Osier-Mixon http://jefro.net/blog
Yocto Project Community Manager @Intel http://yoctoproject.org