[yocto-ab] Minutes: Yocto Advisory Board, 3-May-2011
Osier-mixon, Jeffrey
jeffrey.osier-mixon at intel.com
Tue Jun 7 14:19:56 PDT 2011
Hi everyone - these are my very raw minutes from last month's meeting, which
I apologize for not sending out earlier. This afternoon I will clean these
up, and will also send out a draft agenda for tomorrow's meeting, hope to
see you there.
- roll call & introductions
x jdk at ti.com
x wmills at ti.com
x paul.anderson at windriver.com
x john_cherry at mentor.com
a ehouser at ti.com
• hailara at ti.com
x amy szeto ti
a brad_dixon at mentor.com
a dirk.hohndel at intel.com
x lieu.ta at windriver.com
• dcauchy at mvista.com
x jgreen at mvista.com
a nithya.ruff at windriver.com
x david.c.stewart at intel.com
• atul.bansal at timesys.com
x richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org
x steve at sakoman.com
x philip at balister.org
a morvek at mvista.com
x sean_hudson at dell.com
a tracey.m.erway at intel.com
x ed.nash at timesys.com
Agenda
x Status on prior action items
// set up mailing lists
// only works with http
// dev.yp.org links are all broken
// talk to brad about
- Recap from Collab Summit & ELC events
// good job guys
- Yocto Project community metrics
// set out metrics on wiki & post link
// track commits - already a summary page on git repo
- Feedback on governance & charter discussions described above
- Yocto Project 1.1 planning results & schedule
// 1.0.1 milestone on track for june release, freeze tending toward end of
may
// look on wiki
// migrate 1.0.1 info to own page from release criteria
- Planning for future events, upcoming conferences
// focused on vancouver, looking for travel for prague
sean: rehash, metrics, tighten up webpage - what is breadbutter of these
meetings? what to discuss?
bill: want to see happen dont know proper way to move fwd
message between poky vs oe-core
RP partly technical issue - on OE side, agreements now in oe-core
clear when looking at codebase what is poky, what is oe-core
still some changes to make, need to roll out to users & message, website
bill: writeup somewhere?
RP: how to communicate to users? webpage? target
had discussions on oe-core mailing list, oe-tsc list, decisions
clearer on technical side, needs to be clearer to yocto stakeholders,
best forum?
bill: accept anyw ay that moves fwd
blog post articulating understanding - good unofficial way
a chair is a chair
want t oget clarity
ed nash - happy to read & provide feedback, email or link
RP // wirte up summary & send to this group
bill: some issues we care about in TI, jason started bsp group,
difficult to tell pulse on is this group starting to form, need shot in
arm
how are each company spending engineering time
tricky point - dont want to form cabal, want to make sure to take tiem
to do effort communic well enough
to know what everyone is up to
opportunity within group to make sure putting in & getting out as much
as want to
RP: understands - schdule clear on what being worked on, other particp
orgs not clear
dont know how can communicate internalloy or publicly, focuses
interested in
helpful to understand where people coming from
bill: got into plannin gphase late, coming up to speed on proper venues
number of orgs incl ti, in 1st cycle lot of work to transition to align
w/yocto
lots of owrk upstream at oe
sitll want to exchange info to see what's going on
dave: really like idea, challenges have as a cross-organiz team sharing
what doing,
plans on sohrt term
need guidance on how to share what doing now vs
involvement as well as resources
like anothe rpart of of intel tha tneeds to share what they are doing
more interesting to get insight into what silicon guys are doing, to
communicate
what if have 1-page roadmap, may not want to share with no ndas
friends on call, but businesses compete
dont know right answer
bill: dont need too deep
jason: have 1.1 feature list, isn't that collective worklist?
bill: all wind river & intel, understand 1.1 may look that way
know there are companies, have specific plans to help yocto but no on
page
jason: internal meetings, requesting that ti add to tha tpage
usingtemplate
follow same process
we haven't pushed our plans into that 1.1 releaes
right way is to put into 1.1 release
dave: can offer to have julie sit down with & get started
paul: several categories, some synchronous with 1.1 infrastructural -
core changes
bsp development - planned on 1.0 or targeting 1.1 re hw support
would love ot kinow plans
can operate somewhat asynchronously
some sync with core, some async, dont have to be centrally managed
bill: goals in time period is koen restruc angstrom for oe-core, how
instersect yocto? on yocto page?
ecosystem issue
sep categories of activities assoc with yocto project by various
interested parties
RP: useful page with various particip orgs can put down waht they are
trying to achieve
e.g. angstrom on oe-core
converging on oe-core is hopefully aim - page for each org?
sean: suggesting each org page current yocto activities?
rp yes
general agreement
phil:Z 1.1 more usable by more people with more BSPS, not a general
requirement on list, importanat to do that
rp page
dave need something like that for intel specific stuff
//1 page for each
represent oe - phil can ask what people can do for fall
sean: currently working on (status) plus wish list area fo rpeople to
make suggestions
rp: already have aset of feature pages
on that list can highlight features from specific orgs
sean: primary purposes for meetings, features specific to each company &
feedbak into tech side of community
here something we are working on
role of advisory board, trying to come up with set of high priority
requests to technical side (RP)
include OE (phil)
RP: that is one role
sean : what oathers?
RP: resource mgmt & communication issues beetween comapnies,
marketing/branding delegated to subgroup but
AB keeps finger on overall pulse
dave agrees, see results - report back
business heartbeat at meeting
dave: planning page, split out 1.0.1 is done
RP: one more, facilitate communication in wider fashion between orgs,
tech leads
== what does richard need? ==
making sure there aren no barriers to participation
dave: could use planning page & extend to org specific, place for
interest groups to coordinate
// set up placeholders for subgroups & interest groups, new interest
groups category onj wiki
bill suggesets right afer projects on main wiki page
// write down how interest groups & subgroups work
- List people or organizations on Governance page?
- Is 1 hour long enough for meetings?
warmed up after agenda done
phil: openembedded ev call for members
Action items from previous meeting, status shown if known:
1 - Create mailing lists and infrastructure for AB, interest groups, and
administrative groups [Jefro] - done
2 - Investigate methods for providing phone & IRC support at F2F meetings
[Jefro] - working
3 - Coordinate a F2F meeting around ESC-SV with phone support [Jefro] -
done
4 - Post minutes and results publicly on yoctoproject.org [Jefro] - done
5 - Rename Steering Group to Advisory Board in all public places [Jefro] -
done
6 - Revise website materials to reflect AB decisions [Jefro] - mostly done
7 - Provide transparency on past and present contributions, future plans
[All]
8 - Form an Advocacy and Outreach/Communications administrative group
[Tracey, Nithya, Lieu] - done
9 - Form an infrastructure administrative group [Dave, Sean] - done
want to involve build mesiters, get together offline
10 - Form a BSP interest group [Jason] - done
11 - Advise Maintainers to stick to major/minor release numbering, and to
drive to quality & features within a 2-3 month window - done
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto-ab/attachments/20110607/41f092d8/attachment.html>
More information about the yocto-ab
mailing list