[poky] RFC: create-pull-request / send-pull-request updates

[Darren Hart]

On 05/11/2011 10:40 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:01 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thoughts/Comments?
>>>
>>
>> I would suggest to alter the process a bit and get rid of the scripts
>> completely. Patches are sent to mailing list for review once reviewed
>> the final patches are
>> sent as git pull-request. It would simplify things.

I think I know where you're coming from Khem, and I don't disagree that
it would simplify things for some people. However, we have a wide range
of people working on the various portions of the project. The scripts
offer a means of standardizing how patches are reviewed and pulled, and
I think that has improved things significantly over how things were a
year ago.

With the Linux kernel, the vast majority of patches are just sent to the
list as email. Pull requests are typically sent from sub-maintainers.
However, the poky developers have long been using a pull model for many
contributors. The problem was the patches weren't ever hitting the list.
This led me to write the scripts in the first place. They attempted to
maintain the pull model which worked well for the maintainers while
still ensuring there was easy access to the patches for review.

> 
> I'd argue that it doesn't. It just means the requests come in different
> formats, sometimes with key pieces of information missing which means
> the people trying to handle the requests (like me) get frustrated.
> 
> I find it easiest to deal with requests that have come through those
> scripts.


Obviously we need to try and make things as easy as possible for the
maintainers to merge in changes. One thing I think would be painful for
maintainer with the current model, is that a pull request appears (at
least to me) to be the final version of a patch series, when in fact
they can be the very first iteration and still require review. The pull
does make it easy to do some testing of patches in addition of review
though.

I can certainly see both sides to this.


> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Richard
> 

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel