[poky] git and BB_NO_NETWORK

[Gary Thomas]

On 02/23/2011 04:57 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 08:19 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
>> This is related to bug #752
>>
>> Richard has made some changes which nearly fixes that bug, except
>> for the mtd-utils_1.4.1.bb recipe.  The problem with this recipe
>> is that it specifies a git tag, not a fixed revision.  The fetcher
>> fails in this case as it has to interrogate the git tree to find
>> the tag and that's not allowed because of BB_NO_NETWORK=1
>>
>> I tried to move this to a fixed revision which corresponds to tag v1.4.1
>> like this:
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_1.4.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_1.4.1.bb
>> index 5e6db0e..2c4e276 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_1.4.1.bb
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_1.4.1.bb
>> @@ -6,11 +6,12 @@ LICENSE = "GPLv2+"
>>    LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=0636e73ff0215e8d672dc4c32c317bb3 \
>>                        file://include/common.h;beginline=1;endline=17;md5=ba05b07912a44ea2bf81ce409380049c"
>>
>> -SRC_URI = "git://git.infradead.org/mtd-utils.git;protocol=git;tag=v${PV} \
>> +SRC_URI = "git://git.infradead.org/mtd-utils.git;protocol=git \
>>                   file://add-exclusion-to-mkfs-jffs2-git-2.patch;patch=1"
>>
>>    S = "${WORKDIR}/git/"
>>
>> +PV = "1.4.1${SRCPV}"
>>    PR = "r1"
>>
>>    EXTRA_OEMAKE = "'CC=${CC}' 'CFLAGS=${CFLAGS} -I${S}/include -DWITHOUT_XATTR' 'BUILDDIR=${S}'"
>>
>> I also added this to my fixed-revisions.inc
>> SRCREV_pn-mtd-utils ??= "3c3674a6e1d3f59554b0ff68ca59be2fd4134e0c"
>>
>> Finally, I had to move recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils-1.4.1/add-exclusion-to-mkfs-jffs2-git-2.patch
>> to recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils or else it could not be found.
>>
>> Is there an easier way to solve these issues?  Once I understand the whole process, I can
>> propose a patch.
>
> I think these issues were discussed and resolved in the bugzilla?
>
> http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752
>
> In future please try and keep the discussions in one place, not both, or
> state on the bugzilla you're moving it to email.

Of course.  Actually, it was the other way around, I first
send this to the list in case someone other than you (overworked,
I'm sure) had an idea.  I copied it to the bug just for reference.

Both bugs #752 & 753 seem to be taken care of now.

Thanks

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------