[poky] Autobuilder status

Yu Ke ke.yu at intel.com
Mon Feb 21 16:26:18 PST 2011


On Feb 21, 23:33, Richard Purdie wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> There appear to be three issues on the autobuilder at present which we
> need to get fixed quickly.
> 
> 1) "zypper search avahi" is causing a segfault on some architectures
> with a double free being detected by libc. This seems to be the cause of
> all the runtime sanity test failures.
> 
> 2) The tar issues are fixed but there is an underlying problem with
> error propagation as it appears bitbake was ignoring the sstate
> extraction failure rather than accounting for it in its build task list.
> If extraction fails, that task should not be making the "skip" list but
> it looks like it does. That bug needs fixing too.
> 
> 3) There are a number of dpkg-deb failures on permissions. This looks to
> be pseudo related. Creation of the sstate package and extraction of it
> should be happening under pseudo and the error suggests this is not
> happening.
> 
> I think PaulE is looking at 2), 3) is new and unassigned and I'm not
> sure who is looking at 1) but I'd like to confirm someone is.
> 
> 
> I'm also aware of some other niggling problems:
> 
> a) do_rootfs depends on the populate_sysroot tasks for all the RDEPENDS.
> This appears to be to pull in any tools required for the postinstalls
> and dates to changes I made in 2007. This needs revisiting as its crazy
> to populate all the sysroots when just the rpms are needed for image
> generation.
> 
> Simply put, a "bitbake poky-image-xxx -c rootfs" should just install the
> package_write_rpm tasks it needs and the populate_sysroot for any tools
> needed. No package data or target populate_sysroot tasks should run.
> 
> b) "all" architecture packages seem to be getting reinstalled a lot by
> sstate. Recent changes to the autobuilder should make it clearer when
> this is happening but we should find out why.
> 
> 
> I'll aim to file bugs on these tomorrow but just wanted to write things
> down whilst there were fresh in my mind. I suspect there may be a bug
> open for 1) above but I'd still appreciate a status update on it.

Yes, Bug 722 is for 1), and Qing is looking at it. He will make a status update on this.

Regards
Ke



More information about the poky mailing list