[poky] sstate status

[Paul Eggleton]

On Friday 03 December 2010 22:11:45 Richard Purdie wrote:
> I notice a number of patches in your branches which shouldn't be needed
> if we use the two patches at the head of: 
> 
> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=rpurdie/tweaks2
> 
> Could you please test using those two changes, or let me know if those
> changes cause problems.

I just tested with your branch; it definitely obviates the need to exclude large amounts of variables, however BB_TASKHASH is still being included in the hash and this causes many mismatches.

Cheers,
Paul