[meta-xilinx] 2nd ethernet port not detected

[Edward Wingate]

Just to give more infomation on this, ps7_ethernet_0 goes out MDIO to
the PHY chip, while ps7_ethernet_1 goes out EMIO to a GMII to RGMII IP
block and then to another PHY chip.  Both PHY are the Marvell 88E1518.
Is my device tree for ethernet_1 incorrect for this hardware
configuration?

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Edward Wingate <edwingate8 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have 2 ethernet devices on my custom Zynq board, but Linux only
> detects 1 of them.
>
> [    1.832276] macb e000b000.ps7-ethernet eth0: Cadence GEM at
> 0xe000b000 irq 54 (00:0a:35:00:01:22)
> [    1.841161] macb e000b000.ps7-ethernet eth0: attached PHY driver
> [Marvell 88E1510] (mii_bus:phy_addr=e000b000.ps7-eth:00, irq=-1)
>
> eth0 seems to work fine. I can ssh into the board.
> There are no corresponding messages for eth1.
>
> My device tree for the ethernet devices looks like this:
>
> ps7_ethernet_0: ps7-ethernet at e000b000 {
>     phy-handle = <&phy0>;
>     phy-mode = "rgmii-id";
>     phy0: phy at 0 {
>         compatible = "marvell,88e1518";
>         device_type = "ethernet-phy";
>         reg = <0>;
>     } ;
> } ;
>
> ps7_ethernet_1: ps7-ethernet at e000c000 {
>     phy-handle = <&phy1>;
>     phy-mode = "rgmii-id";
>     phy1: phy at 8 {
>         compatible = "marvell,88e1518";
>         device_type = "ethernet-phy";
>         reg = <8>;
>     } ;
> } ;
>
> Is putting this information in the device tree all that's needed?  The
> PHY address of 8 is what is configured in Vivado for the 2nd ethernet
> port.
>
> Thanks for your help.