[meta-virtualization] [PATCH 3/3] docker: update to v19.03.2-rc1

Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfield at gmail.com
Fri Aug 30 06:24:30 PDT 2019


On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 9:03 AM Stefan Agner <stefan at agner.ch> wrote:
>
> On 2019-08-30 14:42, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 7:36 AM Stefan Agner <stefan at agner.ch> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Stefan Agner <stefan.agner at toradex.com>
> >>
> >> Use the docker/engine fork of moby which provides a stabilized version
> >> of moby in its 19.03 branch.
> >
> > I've mentioned before, this recipe really is going to stay on moby,
> > not a curated version of moby or anything like that.
>
> Hm, I guess you refer to:
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-virtualization/2019-March/004068.html
>
> Generally I see your argumentation, and I think it is good to try to
> build a recipe which tracks Dockers upstream projects.
>
> However, I really don't think its a good idea to build from moby
> directly since it has no proper release process.

That's actually what the point of that recipe is, it's tracking -dev completely.

>
> IMHO, moby is more -dev branch rather than anything a OE recipe should
> rely on. I tried first finding what matches best the Docker version
> "19.03.2-rc1" in Moby, but since this is really a development branch its
> not possible to pick a matching (or close to matching) git commit.
>
> docker/engine is really just a fork with a proper release process. We
> get cli and libnetwork also from the Docker company repos...

Yes, but there's docker-ce for folks that want to follow all the
docker repos. I don't actually think we need the cli/libnetwork in
that recipe anymore, but I haven't had
time to experiment.

>
> The fact that this recipe has the name "docker" and follows the docker
> versioning, I really think it is more reasonable to track
> https://github.com/docker/engine.

Yah, that is a problem. I need to just get on with it and rename the
recipe moby. I said I was going to do it in the spring, but perhaps
I'll just do it this weekend instead.

The problem is, a lot of things (and layers I don't know about)
currently depend on "docker" not "virtual/docker" as I mentioned in my
various other email, so I really need to create a 3rd recipe that
follows the docker engine .. but it really is just a placeholder,
since it isn't different than docker-ce on any significant level.  It
probably leaves me as the only 'moby' user at that point, but that's
ok too :D

i.e. I'd end up with "moby", "docker" and "docker-ce".

I could do that for the fall release and then clean things up in the spring.

Comments ? How does that sound ?

>
> Btw, the reason I started investigate was that I see quite often errors
> like this with the current version:
> docker: Error response from daemon: OCI runtime create failed:
> container_linux.go:345: starting container process caused
> "process_linux.go:299: copying bootstrap data to pipe caused \"write
> init-p: broken pipe\"": unknown.

Hmmm. I've never seen that here and I tend to stress things pretty
heavily in the systems that I build. I assume you aren't seeing it
with docker-ce ?

Bruce

>
> --
> Stefan
>
>
>
> >
> > I already have some queued updated to docker here, so I'll take care
> > of updating this recipe and stack your other patches on top.
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> >>
> >> Bump all git hashes to what is used in Docker CE v19.03.2-rc1.
> >> The SRCREVs are selected through an audit of moby and docker-ce to
> >> synchronize the build points for the various components.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan.agner at toradex.com>
> >> ---
> >>  recipes-containers/docker/docker_git.bb | 8 ++++----
> >>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/recipes-containers/docker/docker_git.bb b/recipes-containers/docker/docker_git.bb
> >> index e45f87e..3892c65 100644
> >> --- a/recipes-containers/docker/docker_git.bb
> >> +++ b/recipes-containers/docker/docker_git.bb
> >> @@ -35,11 +35,11 @@ DESCRIPTION = "Linux container runtime \
> >>  #     to a docker.inc recipe
> >>
> >>  # moby commit matches the docker-ce swarmkit bump on the 18.09 branch
> >> -SRCREV_moby = "344b093258fcb2195fa393081e5224a6c766c798"
> >> +SRCREV_moby = "ed20165a37b40ff1cfbe55e218344c5e89f30ee2"
> >>  SRCREV_libnetwork = "5ac07abef4eee176423fdc1b870d435258e2d381"
> >> -SRCREV_cli = "2f1931f9eb2d6bac2efd48d94739f2e9919d4d7d"
> >> +SRCREV_cli = "578ab52ece34b084621954e0b543003410cdbe84"
> >>  SRC_URI = "\
> >> -       git://github.com/moby/moby.git;nobranch=1;name=moby \
> >> +       git://github.com/docker/engine.git;branch=19.03;name=moby \
> >>         git://github.com/docker/libnetwork.git;branch=master;name=libnetwork;destsuffix=git/libnetwork \
> >>         git://github.com/docker/cli;branch=19.03;name=cli;destsuffix=git/cli \
> >>         file://docker.init \
> >> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ GO_IMPORT = "import"
> >>
> >>  S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
> >>
> >> -DOCKER_VERSION = "19.03.0-rc3"
> >> +DOCKER_VERSION = "19.03.2-rc1"
> >>  PV = "${DOCKER_VERSION}+git${SRCREV_moby}"
> >>
> >>  PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-contrib"
> >> --
> >> 2.20.1
> >>
> >> --
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> meta-virtualization mailing list
> >> meta-virtualization at yoctoproject.org
> >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-virtualization



-- 
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end
- "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II


More information about the meta-virtualization mailing list