[meta-virtualization] Can we have a standard approach for Go?

[Bruce Ashfield]

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Christian Holl <cyborgx1 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I saw that there is a implementation of Go inside
> meta-virtualization.
>
>
> I am currently trying to build influxdb, telegraf and grafana for my
> rasberrypi.
>
> And telegraf depends on docker. Which is also written in Go.
>
> But I am using oe-meta-go for other recipes and they don't work together.
>
> So there is  meta-golang, oe-meta-go and meta-virtualization with go
> implementations.
>

This process is already done in master. I was part of the discussions on
moving
go to oe-core at ELCe in berlin, and Khem took the initiative and collected
our
go changes + oe-meta-go + meta-golang and got them merged into oe-core
for the upcoming 2.3 release.

Those changes won't be backported, but from the 2.3 release and on, we are
moving to the oe-core go variant.

Cheers,

Bruce


>
>
> So could you maybe could someone responsible join our discussion, what to
> use:
>
> https://github.com/madisongh/meta-golang/issues/12
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Christian
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> meta-virtualization mailing list
> meta-virtualization at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-virtualization
>



-- 
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee
at its end"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-virtualization/attachments/20170420/098b2e6e/attachment.html>