[meta-ti] [PATCH 07/10] libgles-omap3: Remove unnecessary inclusion of folders into package

[Sundareson, Prabindh]

Hello Denys,

Any update on below ?


>> You should probably squash those patches then.

I can, with some rework. Please let me know your preference,

regards,
Prabu


-----Original Message-----
From: meta-ti-bounces at yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-ti-bounces at yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Sundareson, Prabindh
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:03 AM
To: Dmytriyenko, Denys
Cc: meta-ti at yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH 07/10] libgles-omap3: Remove unnecessary inclusion of folders into package

Hello Denys,

>> You should probably squash those patches then.

I can, with some rework. Please let me know your preference,


>> Have you tried passing -M to git-format-patch?

No. I read through the submission guidelines, and I did not see anything specific there. How does this help ? Or did you mean this in the context of the squashing ?

regards,
Prabu


-----Original Message-----
From: Dmytriyenko, Denys
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:51 AM
To: Sundareson, Prabindh
Cc: meta-ti at yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH 07/10] libgles-omap3: Remove unnecessary inclusion of folders into package

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:18:36PM -0400, Sundareson, Prabindh wrote:
> Denys,
> 
> Thanks for reviewing,
> 
> It is a simple correction. I had mistakenly removed it in the first 
> one, and reinstated in the next one after comparing with the original 
> patch-set. Is there anything missing you observe ?

You should probably squash those patches then. Otherwise look fine - I just need to diff the first patch in the series against the original. Have you tried passing -M to git-format-patch?

--
Denys


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dmytriyenko, Denys
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:47 AM
> To: Sundareson, Prabindh
> Cc: meta-ti at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH 07/10] libgles-omap3: Remove unnecessary 
> inclusion of folders into package
> 
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:27:56PM +0530, Prabindh Sundareson wrote:
> > Inclusion of all .so files is not necessary for the package build.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Prabindh Sundareson <prabu at ti.com>
> > ---
> >  recipes-graphics/libgles/libgles-omap3-no-x.inc |    4 ----
> >  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/recipes-graphics/libgles/libgles-omap3-no-x.inc
> > b/recipes-graphics/libgles/libgles-omap3-no-x.inc
> > index 8e5dad6..4521d59 100644
> > --- a/recipes-graphics/libgles/libgles-omap3-no-x.inc
> > +++ b/recipes-graphics/libgles/libgles-omap3-no-x.inc
> > @@ -285,10 +285,6 @@ INSANE_SKIP_${PN}-linuxfbwsegl-es6 = "ldflags"
> >  INSANE_SKIP_${PN}-linuxfbwsegl-es8 = "ldflags"
> >  INSANE_SKIP_${PN}-tests = "ldflags"
> >  
> > -# Quality control is really poor on these SDKs, so hack around the latest madness:
> > -FILES_${PN} += "${libdir}/*.so "
> > -FILES_${PN}-dev = "${includedir}"
> 
> I'm confused - you are removing these 2 lines in 7/10 and then immediately re-add them back in 8/10. Why?
> 
> 
> >  inherit update-rc.d
> >  
> >  INITSCRIPT_NAME = "pvr-init"
> > --
> > 1.7.1
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > meta-ti mailing list
> > meta-ti at yoctoproject.org
> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
_______________________________________________
meta-ti mailing list
meta-ti at yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti