[meta-intel] [PATCH] intel-mediasdk: disable git-lfs fetching

[Mittal, Anuj]

On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 17:06 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On 20/09/2019 13:22, Mittal, Anuj wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 11:33 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> > > On 20/09/2019 02:16, Mittal, Anuj wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 23:55 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> > > > > The git-lfs content is only used by the samples which we
> > > > > don't
> > > > > use or
> > > > > install. Set lfs=0 so that git-lfs isn't a requirement on the
> > > > > build
> > > > > host.
> > > > 
> > > > It still tries to fetch the content at the time of unpacking.
> > > > This
> > > > is
> > > > what I get during do_unpack when git-lfs in not in HOSTTOOLS:
> > > > 
> > > > git -c core.fsyncobjectfiles=0 checkout -B intel-mediasdk-19.2
> > > > 885c309f57a7a1cbc60edee6b0d014a36da94562 failed with exit code
> > > > 128,
> > > > output:
> > > > git-lfs filter-process: git-lfs: command not found
> > > > fatal: the remote end hung up unexpectedly
> > > 
> > > I forgot to put in the commit message:
> > > 
> > >     This needs the lfs option to the git fetcher, which is
> > > currently
> > > in
> > >     bitbake master as of
> > > be0b78ccfc5ede98041bc0545a15092494b12b26.
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, I have that commit in my tree. Only change is I commented
> > HOSTTOOLS_NONFATAL = git-lfs in bitbake.conf and manually removed
> > git-
> > lfs link from tmp/hosttools.
> 
> What happens if you actually remove git-lfs from the host, instead
> of 
> fiddling HOSTTOOLS?  I'm wondering if this is git looking for git-lfs 
> in 
> /usr/bin explicitly, but then trying to run it with PATH lookup
> which 
> fails as /usr/bin isn't in $PATH.

Yeah, it looks like git-lfs installs hooks. Works if I uninstall git-
lfs or remove hooks using git-lfs uninstall.

Thanks,

Anuj