[meta-intel] [PATCH 2/4] clang: build Intel common-clang and spirv

[Mittal, Anuj]

On Fri, 2019-04-05 at 17:35 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 14:01, Anuj Mittal <anuj.mittal at intel.com>
> wrote:
> >  ...nge-type-of-block-pointer-for-OpenCL.patch |  152 +++
> >  ...CL-pass-to-handle-new-blocks-represn.patch | 1116
> > +++++++++++++++++
> >  ...001-dont-export-targets-for-binaries.patch |   66 +
> >  .../files/0001-point-to-correct-clang.patch   |   59 +
> >  ...-LLVM-IR-generated-for-OpenCL-blocks.patch |  290 +++++
> >  ...3-OpenCL-Fix-assertion-due-to-blocks.patch |   57 +
> >  .../clang/llvm-project-source.bbappend        |   16 +
> 
> Where do these patches come from?  They're missing upstream-status
> and
> signed-off-by.  Are they sufficiently generic that we can apply them
> to meta-clang instead of clang changing depending on whether
> meta-intel is being used?
> 

Four of these are actually the patches that this specific project
applies at build time [1]. So I took out the patches and added them
here. They have been merged upstream so we probably won't need these
for 9.0 release. They are generic but are essentially backports and
don't strictly look like bug fixes to me. What do you think?

I will add the Upstream-Status and Signed-off-by.

Thanks,

Anuj

[1] https://github.com/intel/opencl-clang/tree/ocl-open-80/patches