[meta-intel] outdated dpdk-dev-libibverbs
Cal Sullivan
california.l.sullivan at intel.com
Wed Mar 14 11:15:32 PDT 2018
Nevermind, I see you figured it out!
Thanks,
Cal
On 03/14/2018 11:14 AM, Cal Sullivan wrote:
> Hmm, I'm not sure. Are you subscribed to the list? IIRC I had to
> manually approve your initial mail. Could be related.
>
> Thanks,
> Cal
>
> On 03/14/2018 04:01 AM, Belal, Awais wrote:
>>
>> Hi Cal,
>>
>>
>> Thanks a lot for the reply.
>>
>>
>> >> If you (or any other users of meta-intel-dpdk on the list) could
>> test using upstream libibverbs it would be much appreciated. I could
>> then fix it >> to use upstream libibverbs or take a patch for it.
>>
>>
>> I'll have a look in near future hopefully.
>>
>>
>> Right now I am trying to send a patch to meta-intel at yoctoproject.org
>> using git send-email but it is failing with "550 5.7.1 Unable to
>> relay", any pointers?
>>
>>
>> BR,
>> /Awais/
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Cal Sullivan <california.l.sullivan at intel.com>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, March 10, 2018 4:17 AM
>> *To:* Belal, Awais; meta-intel at yoctoproject.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [meta-intel] outdated dpdk-dev-libibverbs
>> Hi Awais,
>>
>> I don't know the history of why that version of libibverbs was used
>> instead. Considering it no longer exists, I agree that it should be
>> changed. Unfortunately I don't have any experience and likely lack
>> the hardware for using dpdk, so I can only go as far as making sure
>> it builds OK.
>>
>> If you (or any other users of meta-intel-dpdk on the list) could test
>> using upstream libibverbs it would be much appreciated. I could then
>> fix it to use upstream libibverbs or take a patch for it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Cal
>>
>> On 03/09/2018 03:02 AM, Belal, Awais wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> I was going through the meta-dpdk layer () and the actual dpdk
>>> package depends on dpdk-dev-libibverbs. Now, looking at the recipe
>>> for dpdk-dev-libibverbs it uses and outdated SRC_URI for fetching
>>> the sources (the actual tarball pointed to: does not exist) and the
>>> yocto mirror is used to fetch the tarball instead. Are there any
>>> plans of fixing/updating this? Why isn't this using a generic
>>> libibverbs source?
>>>
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> /Awais/
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-intel/attachments/20180314/06d1e2d9/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the meta-intel
mailing list