[meta-intel] [PATCH] uefi-comboapp.bbclass: Split signing functionality into its own bbclass

Patrick Ohly patrick.ohly at intel.com
Wed Jul 19 03:18:07 PDT 2017


On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 16:56 -0700, California Sullivan wrote:
> In the future more secure boot implementations will be offered, with
> each one needing the signing method. Instead of repeating a forty line
> block of code across several recipes, just use a configurable bbclass.

Looks good to me, and also worked in refkit after changing the cert and
db variables.

Perhaps this should be merged into meta-intel already for M2, to avoid
breaking the API (= variable names) again shortly after M2?

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.





More information about the meta-intel mailing list