[meta-intel] [PATCH 2/2] rmc-db: LICENSE is straight MIT so just use common-license/MIT

[Jianxun Zhang]

Review +1

Thanks, Saul. I hesitated when deciding which MIT copy is for MIT, but my decision was poor…



> On Feb 28, 2017, at 1:12 PM, Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> The OE-Core LICENSE is mostly MIT, but should not be used as a checksum
> file for a purely MIT licensed package.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc-db.bb | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc-db.bb b/common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc-db.bb
> index 99565fd..f24ed11 100644
> --- a/common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc-db.bb
> +++ b/common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc-db.bb
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ information."
> 
> LICENSE = "MIT"
> 
> -LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${COREBASE}/LICENSE;md5=4d92cd373abda3937c2bc47fbc49d690"
> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${COREBASE}/meta/files/common-licenses/MIT;md5=0835ade698e0bcf8506ecda2f7b4f302"
> 
> S = "${WORKDIR}"
> 
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> meta-intel mailing list
> meta-intel at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel