[meta-intel] [PATCH V2 2/3] linux-intel: remove ixgbe and ixgbevf

Wold, Saul saul.wold at intel.com
Wed Aug 23 15:08:17 PDT 2017


On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 15:39 +0300, Mikko Ylinen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> On 21/08/17 09:26, Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif wrote:
> > 
> > removing in-tree ixgbe and ixgbevf kernel modules to enable out-of-
> > tree ixgbe and ixgbevf modules from linux-intel
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif <syed.johan.arif
> > .syed.mohamad.fauzi at intel.com>
> > ---
> >   common/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-intel.inc | 2 ++
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/common/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-intel.inc
> > b/common/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-intel.inc
> > index 20f01f0..3b0c576 100644
> > --- a/common/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-intel.inc
> > +++ b/common/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-intel.inc
> > @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ do_compile_kernelmodules_append() {
> >   	rm -rf ${B}/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi
> >   	rm -rf ${B}/net/mac80211
> >   	rm -rf ${B}/net/wireless
> > +	rm -rf ${B}/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe
> > +	rm -rf ${B}/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf
> >   }
> >   
> >   RDEPENDS_kernel-modules += "iwlwifi"
> 
> This does not look right (the same for iwlwifi).  Why not to disable
> the config fragments if the modules are not wanted?
> 
Mikko,

Since we are using the same base yocto-kernel-cache data for both the
linux-intel and linux-yocto kernel, the value add by the linux-intel
kernel is that it uses the out of tree modules (newer, shiner, better),
while the linux-yocto kernel still needs to have the iwlwifi and ixgbe
drivers there, since it does not DEPEND on the iwlwifi OOT modules.

So removal is easiest.

Sau!


> -- Mikko


More information about the meta-intel mailing list