[meta-intel] [PATCH resend] intel-gpu-tools: modify packaging to support different usages

[Chatre, Reinette]

Hi Ross,

I tried to modify the patch to add the benchmark debug files to the existing –dbg package but since the –benchmark and –tests package needs to be populated first (so that their files do not end up in intel-gpu-tools) the FILES for –benchmark package captures its .debug files and triggers the QA issue “QA Issue: non debug package contains .debug directory”. Could you please guide how to have benchmark .debug files end up in –dbg package while still being able to have –benchmark and –tests packages?

Reinette

From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.burton at intel.com]
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 3:04 PM
To: Chatre, Reinette <reinette.chatre at intel.com>
Cc: meta-intel at yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH resend] intel-gpu-tools: modify packaging to support different usages


On 8 February 2016 at 22:24, Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre at intel.com<mailto:reinette.chatre at intel.com>> wrote:
+PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-benchmarks-dbg ${PN}-benchmarks ${PN}-tests"

In oe-core master -dbg packages are automatically populated so you don't need to list the FILES_ for them.  Also it's best practise to have a single -dbg package (and -dev) per recipe unless there's an exceptional rationale.  The only recipe I can recall with such a rationale is Qt5 because one of the modules contains WebKit, which is several gig of -dbg.

Ross
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-intel/attachments/20160209/71040bf7/attachment-0001.html>