[meta-intel] [fido][PATCH v2 2/2] meta-crystalforest: qat makefile patches

[Ong, Boon Leong]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: meta-intel-bounces at yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-intel-
>bounces at yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Saul Wold
>Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 4:53 AM
>To: Mittal, AnujX; meta-intel at yoctoproject.org
>Subject: Re: [meta-intel] [fido][PATCH v2 2/2] meta-crystalforest: qat makefile
>patches
>
>
>These patches should be part of the actual recipe patch since they are referenced
>in that recipe.
>
>Think one logical unit, such that if we tried to bisect we would not get failures,
>with 2 patches, this will cause a failure between the 2 patches if bisect lands
>there.
>
Saul,

Speaking of this matter,
I have seen maintainer from other community prefer smaller commits than one single logical unit. 
So, I asked Anuj & others here to make it smaller so that it is easier to keep track of the changes instead
one single large commit. 

It seems that you put more emphasis on single unit commit that helps in term of git bisect. 
Is that your preference? 

I do think that 2/2 --> 1/2 and 1/2 -> 2/2 in this patch-series to avoid partially update the patchseries 
and have build issue.

I would like to hear your commend here so that I don't get "dinged' by you in future ... =-)