[meta-intel] [PATCH 3/3] libva-intel-driver: Update to 1.6.0

[Lim, Siew Hoon]

> On 23 July 2015 at 10:46, Lim Siew Hoon <siew.hoon.lim at intel.com> wrote:
> +Tested-by: Lim, Siew Hoon <siew.hoon.lim at intel.com>
> +Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao at intel.com>

> Missing Upstream-Status: Backport.

Sorry. Ok, I will add in. 
I'm now a bit confused. Which upstream status I should be using Backport or Accepted?
Read in www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines

Now I felt sound like the accepted should be using.
Backport also correct as well, I really backport the fixed from upstream master into this fixed version. 


Is this information status needed like below:

Upstream-Status: Accepted
- The code fixed already accepted in upstream, and expected to be in next release.
- Currently backport this code fixed from upstream into 1.6.0 fixed version.
- Bugzilla status for this issue is closed fixed.
- Expected version info? Can I put wait for next release or totally skip first?
(Because I'm really sure what is next release version in libva-intel-driver. It could be 1.6.1 or 1.7.0. This really depends on next release from libva-intel-driver.)


Thanks.
....siewhoon