[meta-intel] Why meta-intel never specify the Intel-SNA as a primary Xorg driver in common folder ?

[Ahmad, Mohd Azril]

Ok .. now I can see a clear picture on why meta-intel never prefix the xorg.conf to “intel” as common due to the impact on certain platforms, unless it been specified in the corresponding machine/platform meta-layer itself ..

Thanks a lot Ross and Boon Leong on clarifying this … this is valuable input for me ☺

Regards,
Azril

From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.burton at intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 9:36 PM
To: Ong, Boon Leong
Cc: Ahmad, Mohd Azril; meta-intel at yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [meta-intel] Why meta-intel never specify the Intel-SNA as a primary Xorg driver in common folder ?


On 16 April 2015 at 12:48, Ong, Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong at intel.com<mailto:boon.leong.ong at intel.com>> wrote:
Yes, some CID platform which is address data-center processor/chipset uses external PCIe VESA graphic card.

And there's a number of Atom platforms that use GMA500/600 graphics and so need the modesettings driver.

Ross
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-intel/attachments/20150417/b96147de/attachment.html>