[meta-intel] [Patch v5 5/5] use the INITRD list mechanism for early microcode loading

[Hart, Darren]

On 9/2/14, 10:18, "Kamble, Nitin A" <nitin.a.kamble at intel.com> wrote:

>> 
>> Hrm... I confess I forget where we left this. Do we not need the enabled
>> condition? What happens if you try to build images for meta-intel
>>systems
>> without the meta-intel license whitelisted? My understanding is that
>>those
>> recipes still need to parse, but that will fail if the license
>>requirements are not
>> met.
>
>The recipe does not need the whitelisted license anymore. It is similar
>to the linux-firmware recipe now.
>So no checks are necessary anymore.
>
>Nitin
>

How is this the case? In 3/5, the new recipe includes the line:

+LICENSE = "Intel-Microcode-License"


So, how is it the license does not need to be whitelisted?

-- 
Darren Hart					Open Source Technology Center
darren.hart at intel.com				            Intel Corporation