[meta-intel] YP1.5 openssl-qat-module and zlib-qat-module: remove from meta-intel

Ong, Boon Leong boon.leong.ong at intel.com
Thu Sep 26 18:04:34 PDT 2013



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zanussi, Tom
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 2:02 AM
> To: Ong, Boon Leong
> Cc: meta-intel at yoctoproject.org; DiGiglio, John
> Subject: Re: [meta-intel] YP1.5 openssl-qat-module and zlib-qat-module:
> remove from meta-intel
> 
> On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 01:50 -0500, Ong, Boon Leong wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Zanussi, Tom
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 11:22 AM
> > > To: Ong, Boon Leong
> > > Cc: meta-intel at yoctoproject.org; DiGiglio, John
> > > Subject: Re: [meta-intel] YP1.5 openssl-qat-module and zlib-qat-module:
> > > remove from meta-intel
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 02:41 +0000, Ong, Boon Leong wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 	This to follow-up from PDT discussion about the removal of QAT
> > > related recipes, please kindly remove  "openssl-qat-module" and
> > > "zlib-qat- module" from YP1.5 meta-intel git as follow:
> > > > 	The reason is these software ingredients are obsolete and
> > > unmaintained any more.
> > > >
> > > > 	http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-
> > > intel/tree/common/recipes-connectivity/openssl-qat-module
> > > > 	http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-
> > > intel/tree/common/recipes-core/zlib-qat-module
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, ok, can you please submit a patch to remove them then, with
> > > that as the commit message?
> > >
> > [Ong, Boon Leong]
> > 	Please see newly patch request sent out under title "[PATCH 0/1]
> [PATCH] meta-intel <master>: openssl-qat-module and zlib-qat-module
> recipes removal"
> >
> 
> Pulled into meta-intel/master.
> 
> One thing I noticed is that those machines still use the corpus recipes (are the
> corpus recipes useful without qat?)

[Ong, Boon Leong] 
	The corpus recipes are meant for compression & decompression performance. It is used to measure QAT performance. 
	I recommend that we just remove the recipe from meta-crystalforest/conf/machine conf files: MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS.
	We can keep the common/recipes-corpuse/calgary-corpus & canterbury-corpus there so that it can be easily included into BSP built by others. 
	Is this agreeable?   If yes, I can generate patch for this removal

Cheers,
Boon Leong

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tom
> 
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Tom
> > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Ong Boon Leong
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > meta-intel mailing list
> > > > meta-intel at yoctoproject.org
> > > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
> > >
> >
> 



More information about the meta-intel mailing list