[meta-freescale] Fixing imx-vpu-hantro header installation

Tom Hochstein tom.hochstein at nxp.com
Tue Jul 31 09:14:40 PDT 2018


That's great, thanks again.

Tom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carlos Rafael Giani [mailto:dv at pseudoterminal.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2018 11:13 AM
> To: Tom Hochstein <tom.hochstein at nxp.com>; meta-
> freescale at yoctoproject.org; Carol Zhu <carol.zhu at nxp.com>; Eagle Zhou
> <eagle.zhou at nxp.com>; Bing Song <bing.song at nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] Fixing imx-vpu-hantro header installation
> 
> I was actually working on a patch myself. I could send that in during the next few
> days.
> 
> Carlos
> 
> 
> On 2018-07-31 17:33, Tom Hochstein wrote:
> > Thanks, Carlos, we will fix these issues.
> >
> > Does this require an immediate fix, or can it wait until our next upstreaming?
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: meta-freescale-bounces at yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-freescale-
> >> bounces at yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Rafael Giani
> >> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 9:01 AM
> >> To: meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
> >> Subject: [meta-freescale] Fixing imx-vpu-hantro header installation
> >>
> >> Currently, the headers from imx-vpu-hantro are installed in the
> >> ${includedir} directory, which is /usr/include/ in Yocto.
> >>
> >> This is bad, because there are multiple headers, and none of them
> >> have names that are distinguishable enough. There are headers called
> >> codec.h, version.h, util.h for example.
> >>
> >> Placing multiple headers into /usr/include/ that belong to a specific
> >> library or package is not good. In the Unix world, it is generally
> >> considered good practice to place such headers in a subdirectory instead.
> >>
> >> I would recommend doing that here as well. Let the imx-vpu-hantro
> >> recipe create a "hantro/" or "imx-vpu-hantro/" subdirectory in
> >> ${includedir}, and install the headers there. I realize that the
> >> imx-vpuwrap and imx-gst1.0-plugin recipes expect the headers to be in
> >> ${includedir}, but this can be circumvented by adding an include path
> >> command line flag to their CFLAGS. I think this is preferable over keeping
> these headers in the main include directory.
> >>
> >> Also, the preprocessor definitions that the top level makefile
> >> selects are not specified in any header. Typically, such options are
> >> recorded in something like config.h so that code that uses the
> >> library can use #ifdef to make sure its code matches. For example,
> >> there is the USE_EXTERNAL_BUFFER macro, which is enabled in the toplevel
> makefile.
> >> This macro enables additional fields in several C structs, so knowing
> >> whether or not imx-vpu-hantro was build with this macro is important.
> >>
> >> --
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> meta-freescale mailing list
> >> meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
> >> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fli
> >> sts.yo
> >> ctoproject.org%2Flistinfo%2Fmeta-
> >>
> freescale&data=02%7C01%7Ctom.hochstein%40nxp.com%7C3725db8cffb
> >>
> 94138838308d5f3cb1624%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0
> >>
> %7C636682975941245444&sdata=K3DIn5sHeK5INkwp3YxABiBvoGUkiWYy
> >> nUa0po5ASsw%3D&reserved=0



More information about the meta-freescale mailing list