[meta-freescale] [PATCH v2 43/43] imx-vpu: Clarify compatibility for Chips&Media VPU

[Gary Bisson]

Hi Tom,

Is there any plan to rename that package to match what is done for hantro?
imx-vpu-<ip provider name>

Wouldn't it be clearer to people to have virtual/imxvpu being backed
by either imx-vpu-hantro or imx-vpu-cnm (or chipsnmedia)?

Regards,
Gary Bisson
Boundary Devices, LLC
www.boundarydevices.com


On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 10:05 PM, Tom Hochstein <tom.hochstein at nxp.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Tom Hochstein <tom.hochstein at nxp.com>
> ---
>  recipes-bsp/imx-vpu/imx-vpu_5.4.38.bb | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/recipes-bsp/imx-vpu/imx-vpu_5.4.38.bb b/recipes-bsp/imx-vpu/imx-vpu_5.4.38.bb
> index f0c9d5a..d886e30 100644
> --- a/recipes-bsp/imx-vpu/imx-vpu_5.4.38.bb
> +++ b/recipes-bsp/imx-vpu/imx-vpu_5.4.38.bb
> @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
>  # Copyright (C) 2013-2018 O.S. Systems Software LTDA.
>  # Copyright (C) 2013-2016 Freescale Semiconductor
> -# Copyright 2017 NXP
> +# Copyright 2017-2018 NXP
>
> -DESCRIPTION = "Freescale VPU library"
> +DESCRIPTION = "Freescale Chips&Media VPU library"
>  LICENSE = "Proprietary"
>  LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=75abe2fa1d16ca79f87cde926f05f72d"
>
> @@ -32,4 +32,4 @@ do_install () {
>  }
>
>  PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_ARCH}"
> -COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(mx6)"
> +COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(mx6q|mx6dl)"
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> meta-freescale mailing list
> meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale