[meta-freescale] Where to post patches for 'linux-fslc'

John Pothier jpothier at izotope.com
Tue Apr 10 07:21:01 PDT 2018


Hi Fabio,

Yes, the bug exists on mainline. We just haven't gotten around to
submitting the patch. If you're curious for more details, here's the
description of our internal PR:

Our "no-1-8-v" flag in the device tree is supposed to disable 1.8V mmc, but
> commit 8cb851a4da64aa838c3cb4fa76ad130ace2b5a98
> <http://stash-prod.izotope.int:7990/projects/HDW/repos/linux-imx/commits/8cb851a4da64aa838c3cb4fa76ad130ace2b5a98>
>  in mainline changed the voltage selection logic. Choice quote:
>
> Signal voltage support is not a quirk, it is a capability.
>
> Freescale's sdhci-esdhc-imx.c sets MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR without regard to this
> flag, and with the new voltage selection logic, this MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR
> forces 1.8V to be enabled. So we change the effect of "no-1-8-v" to disable
> MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR.
>
>
John

On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Matt,
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 8:56 PM, Matt Campbell <mcampbell at izotope.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Thanks for the input. I'll check if the bug exists on mainline and submit
> > there if it does.
>
> Just curious: does the esdhc bug exist in mainline or not?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/attachments/20180410/3d24b6b1/attachment.html>


More information about the meta-freescale mailing list