[meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 00/50] QorIQ patches

[Zhenhua Luo]

Hi Bob, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Cochran [mailto:yocto at mindchasers.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2016 12:37 AM
> 
> On 08/01/2016 11:02 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Ting Liu <ting.liu at nxp.com> wrote:
> >> [Liu Ting-B28495] I did not see new commits on github meta-freescale layer
> since Jul 22.
> >> The tree I sent on July 23 was already based on the latest.
> > I cloned it here for review. I will give my initial feedback here so
> > you guys can rework the patches but those need to be send here anyway
> > for people to review them as well.
> >
> Please let us know when meta-freescale has been updated other than on
> https://github.com/luozhenhua/meta-freescale/commits/master-qoriq
> 
> I'm assuming we're going to see a meta-freescale repo on git.yoctoproject.org.
> Please confirm that this ( is still ) the plan.
[Luo Zhenhua] Yes, it is still the plan. 

> Are the udev settings right in the meta-freescale/conf folder for qoriq?
> 
> conf$  grep udev * -r
> 
> machine/include/imx-base.inc:# Extra udev rules machine/include/imx-
> base.inc:MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS += "udev-rules-imx"
> machine/include/qoriq.inc:MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS += "udev-
> extraconf kernel-modules"
> 
> Don't we want to pull in udev-rules-qoriq?  Also, I'm wondering 
> why udev-extraconf is listed for qoriq and not imx.
 [Luo Zhenhua] udev-rules-qoriq rename the Eth interfaces to align with fman ports, so I think it is better to add it by default. 


Best Regards,

Zhenhua