[meta-freescale] [OE-core] trouble related to oe-core update

[Otavio Salvador]

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Andreas Müller
<schnitzeltony at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:46:03AM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> have seen that a while ago but had no time to take care.
>>>
>>> Since oe-core commit
>>>
>>> commit 3e760031f91fb87c3e2f62b77a117eb41164f259
>>> Author: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com>
>>> Date:   Wed Feb 18 15:40:35 2015 +0100
>>>
>>>     feature-arm-thumb.inc: respect ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET when adding thumb suffix
>>>
>>> I get
>>>
>>> ERROR:  OE-core's config sanity checker detected a potential misconfiguration.
>>>     Either fix the cause of this error or at your own risk disable the
>>> checker (see sanity.conf).
>>>     Following is the list of potential problems / advisories:
>>>
>>>     Error, the PACKAGE_ARCHS variable does not contain TUNE_PKGARCH
>>> (cortexa9t2hf-vfp-neon).
>>>
>>> I don't understand this fully but it seems that
>>> fsl-dynamic-packagearch.bbclass would add this pkg arch but this never
>>> happens because sanity.bbclass is executed first and interrupts
>>> parsing. What I don't understand: Am I the only one having this issue
>>>o
>> I'm not using meta-fsl*, butdo you have this patch in your setup?
>> http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/90989/
>> it was discussed off-list a while ago and this change looks like result
>> of that discussion.
>>
> Have meta-fsl-arm current master in my layers. This contains a similar patch:
>
> commit bfe01a0ebde407086f4a7710ea165c6beff310d7
> Author: Max Krummenacher <max.oss.09 at gmail.com>
> Date:   Mon Mar 30 23:49:32 2015 +0200
>
>     fsl-dynamic-packagearch: add all MACHINE_SOCARCH feeds
>
> Have rebased the mentionioned patch -> same result.
>
> My problem seems to be that sanity.bbclass bails out before code in
> fsl-dynamic-packagearch.bbclass is executed (and would fix). Playing
> around with layer priorities / order of layers nothing changed
> situation.

What board are you using?

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750