[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-demos][PATCH] riotboard: Fix broken image builds against linux-fslc

[Daiane Angolini]

On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov <picmaster at mail.bg> wrote:
> Hi Fabio,
>
> On 05/04/2015 03:41 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>>
>> Hi Nikolay,
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov
>> <picmaster at mail.bg> wrote:
>>
>>> +# FIXME: Workaround for building against linux-fslc
>>> +RDEPENDS_${PN}_remove_imx6dl-riotboard = "gst-plugins-gl"
>>
>>
>> This doesn't seem to scale very well as we would need to put every
>> mx6q/dl board that uses linux-fslc in this list.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Fabio Estevam
>
>
> I completely understand and agree, but I don't feel qualified to force
> all other mx6 maintainers to use the same approach. If others decide to
> go this way, we can then use the "_remove" clause for all "mx6" SOCs,
> and put appropriate comment in the file. But as of today, I don't see
> such push.

gst-plugins-gl is included in the image by:
https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-demos/blob/master/recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-gstreamer-full.bb#L21

right?

So, remove opengl from your DISTRO_FEATURES and it should work.


However, we have already this line:

https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-demos/blob/master/recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-gstreamer-full.bb#L27

Which means mx6sl cannot handle gst-plugins-gl. Riot is not mx6sl, so
maybe you have spoted another corner case.

>
> Considering the amount of discussion my patches provoke, I'm now more
> inclined to propose micro-changes that are more obvious/easier to
> approve and move forward.

Please, keep the discussion up and running. Please, keep the questions
and the patches, we really need more experienced board maintainers for
the community boards.

Daiane
>
> Kind regards,
> Nikolay
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> meta-freescale mailing list
> meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale