[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-ppc] recent breakage

[ting.liu at freescale.com]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: meta-freescale-bounces at yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-freescale-
> bounces at yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Gary Thomas
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 3:52 AM
> To: Bob Cochran; meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-ppc] recent breakage
> 
> On 2015-01-15 12:38, Bob Cochran wrote:
> > On 01/15/2015 12:46 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> >> This commit breaks a build when an image contains udev-extraconf
> >>
> >> commit d7df92b6f5c1a673341d54d6b064ad2fd7b16d74
> >> Author: Ting Liu <ting.liu at freescale.com>
> >> Date:   Wed Jan 7 17:54:59 2015 +0800
> >>
> >>      udev-extraconf: replace bbappend with own recipe
> >>
> >>      * introduce variable RULE for DPAA FMan ethernet ports name rule.
> >>      * use 72-fsl-dpaa-persistent-networking.rules for t1024, same as
> >> e6500.
> >>
> >>      Signed-off-by: Ting Liu <ting.liu at freescale.com>
> >>
> >> Since this change, I get this error when building:
> >>   * check_data_file_clashes: Package udev-rules-qoriq wants to
> >> install file
> >> /local/diskstation-cutting-edge_2015-01-08/tmp/work/p1022ds-amltd-lin
> >> ux-gnuspe/amanda-server-image/1.0-r0/rootfs/etc/udev/mount.blacklist
> >>
> >>          But that file is already provided by package  *
> >> udev-extraconf
> >
> >
> > I'm wondering where the root cause is located.  The recipe isn't
> > installing the blacklist file.  It's just appending to it (if it already
> exists), so why is there a clash?  Does the recipe need modification or is the
> problem in the framework?
> 
> One recipe doesn't get to modify the results of a different recipe so the
> do_install() step is really creating a second copy of the blacklist file
> (which if you don't have udev-extraconf installed isn't used anyway)
> 
> >
> > As an aside, should the udev-rules-qoriq recipe see if the blacklists
> already exist before issuing the append (echo) statements?
> >
> > Lastly, I think I like having the separate recipe rather than the udev-
> extraconf append since I can easily just leave it out of my image, which I'm
> currently doing.
> 
> Well I would like to have udev-extraconf in my image (that's what choices are
> all about) and this version of udev-rules-qoriq is making that impossible :-(
[Liu Ting-B28495] this is a bug, we will fix it ASAP.

> 
> >
> >>
> >> I don't see why this was changed from using .bbappend for the
> >> udev-extraconf - it seems wrong headed to me.
> >>
> 
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
> MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> _______________________________________________
> meta-freescale mailing list
> meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale