[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH] add custom-licenses dir for freescale EULA

Otavio Salvador otavio at ossystems.com.br
Thu Feb 5 06:59:26 PST 2015


On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Daiane Angolini <daiane.list at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Otavio Salvador
> <otavio at ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Daiane Angolini <daiane.list at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:03 AM,  <b40290 at freescale.com> wrote:
>>>> From: Chunrong Guo <B40290 at freescale.com>
>>>
>>> I think your patch highlighted a problem.
>>>
>>> I agree with having a custom-licenses directory. But when this patch
>>> is merged, we are going to have 2 different EULAs in different places.
>>>
>>> And one is called Freescale-EULA
>>>
>>> and the other EULA
>>>
>>> So, I think it would be better to have EULA copied into
>>> custom-licenses, and a better name should be used for both EULA files.
>>>
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>
>> Fully agree. We need to check:
>>
>> * if both are the same or not
>> * put in place the system to ask for whitelist each
>> * move to LICENSE_WHITELIST mechanishm
>> * rework unpack binary to check for each EULA when appropriate
>
> * double check which one to display at first source setup-environment time

We will likely have two EULA being displayed and confirmed.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750


More information about the meta-freescale mailing list