[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-demos][PATCH 01/12] packagegroup-fsl-benchmark.bb: New packagegroup for benchmarks

Otavio Salvador otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br
Tue Aug 25 10:06:06 PDT 2015

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Dominic Sacré <dominic.sacre at gmx.de> wrote:
> On 2015-08-25 16:20, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov <picmaster at mail.bg> wrote:
>>> Can you please exclude "fio" from RDEPENDS_${PN}-extended, at least for
>>> ARM boards? Here's more info about the issue:
>>> https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-demos/commit/836bdf5a9d500ed258f1ddc07d89eca74a704098
>> This is the very same packagegroup as
>> packagegroup-fsl-tools-benchmark; there are two differences though:
>>  a. it is split in core and extended
>>  b. it includes fio
>> The core and extended for a benchmark packagegroup seems pointless as
>> both offer same functionality. So I think what we have is more
>> suitable for general use.
>> I thus ask you to remove this patch for next patchset. The 'fio'
>> package has been removed on purpose as it was causing builds to fail
>> so if it needs to be added back a more careful test needs to be done
>> before reverting the patch which has removed it.
> The issue with fio was just temporary (a QA fix for x86 broke ARM
> builds) and is fixed in meta-openembedded master:
> https://github.com/openembedded/meta-openembedded/commit/eb01b36cb3f2f686bc05c690b06d1e0680dda1f5
> There's no need to exclude fio from packagegroup-fsl-tools-benchmark.

This is indeed what I thought and it must to be proper tested so we
can revert the patch which removes it with a proper commit log. As you
been testing it, can you propose the revert?

Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750

More information about the meta-freescale mailing list