[meta-freescale] [PATCH v2 2/5] ls-debug: add recipe

[Luo Zhenhua]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 5:56 PM
> To: Luo Zhenhua-B19537 <zhenhua.luo at freescale.com>
> Cc: meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org; Weng White-B18292
> <White.Weng at freescale.com>; Schmitt Richard-B43082
> <richard.schmitt at freescale.com>; Post Lauren-RAA013
> <Lauren.Post at freescale.com>; Angolini Daiane-B19406
> <Daiane.Angolini at freescale.com>
> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [PATCH v2 2/5] ls-debug: add recipe
> 
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Luo Zhenhua <zhenhua.luo at freescale.com>
> wrote:
> >> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br]
> >> I disagree. It should be ls1021a SoCs not the TWR board only.
> > [Luo Zhenhua-B19537] ls1021a family only has one supported
> board(ls1021atwr) currently, it is identical to use ls1021a SOCs and ls1021atwr at
> this time. We can change to ls1021a SOCs when multiple boards of ls1021a are
> supported by this package.
> 
> That is a very serious misconception on the BSP design. We do the layer
> development for custom board to be easier to be supported and Freescale
> having one board does not mean others cannot reuse the components for
> their boards development.  Every BSP component should be designed with
> reusability in mind and this is reduces the time to market development and
> speeds the development being critical for customers.
[Luo Zhenhua-B19537] I agree with your point on components reusability. 
	We can't guarantee that this package can work well on 3rd party's boards of same SOC, so it is better to add the new board in the COMPATIBLE_MACHINE after verification. 


Best Regards,

Zhenhua
 
> --
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750