[meta-freescale] [PATCH v2 2/5] ls-debug: add recipe

[Daiane Angolini]

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo at freescale.com> wrote:
> ls-debug is Layerscape debug file system module, it supports the
> ls1021atwr board debug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo at freescale.com>
> ---
>  recipes-kernel/ls-debug/ls-debug_git.bb | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/ls-debug/ls-debug_git.bb
>
> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/ls-debug/ls-debug_git.bb b/recipes-kernel/ls-debug/ls-debug_git.bb
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5350e1d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/recipes-kernel/ls-debug/ls-debug_git.bb
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +SUMMARY = "Layerscape Debug File System Module"
> +DESCRIPTION = "This package is the kernel module which is used for \
> +ls1021atwr board debug."

I'm going to accept this poor description, maybe in future we can rework it.

But, are you really including one package that only work for one board
and cannot be used for another board using the same SoC? just curious

If Otavio is OK with this patch I have nothing against it


Daiane
> +SECTION = "ls-debug"
> +LICENSE = "GPLv2+"
> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=94263f12f9416f9fd0493c8f9e8085a3"
> +
> +inherit module autotools-brokensep
> +
> +SRC_URI = "git://git.freescale.com/ppc/sdk/ls-dbg.git;branch=master"
> +SRCREV = "40501f6659e880d38508cdd34a4df2d348d1c68e"
> +
> +S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
> +
> +EXTRA_OECONF += "--with-linux=${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}"
> +EXTRA_OEMAKE += 'SYSROOT="${D}"'
> +
> +COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(ls1021atwr)"
> --
> 2.4.3
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> meta-freescale mailing list
> meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale