[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm] mesa-demos broken on nitrogen6x

Otavio Salvador otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br
Mon Aug 17 17:00:03 PDT 2015


On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Ann Thornton
> <Ann.Thornton at freescale.com> wrote:
>>
>> The reason it doesn't just use _mx6 is that is doesn't apply to _mx6ul.
>>
>> I don't think it is valid to have a machine that is both mx6dl and mx6q.
>
> We currently have machines that support multiple mx6 variants:
>
> conf/machine/cgtqmx6.conf:SOC_FAMILY = "mx6:mx6dl:mx6q"
> conf/machine/cm-fx6.conf:SOC_FAMILY = "mx6:mx6dl:mx6q"
> conf/machine/cubox-i.conf:SOC_FAMILY = "mx6:mx6dl:mx6q"
> conf/machine/nitrogen6x.conf:SOC_FAMILY = "mx6:mx6dl:mx6q"
> conf/machine/ventana.conf:SOC_FAMILY = "mx6:mx6dl:mx6q"
> conf/machine/wandboard.conf:SOC_FAMILY = "mx6:mx6dl:mx6q"

Ann, Fabio is right. This is a very valid use case.

Some boards has been using some strategies (SPI NOR for U-Boot or
U-Boot SPL) to support multiple SoCs in same images (Q or DL) with
great success.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750


More information about the meta-freescale mailing list