[meta-freescale] R: Status of imx28evk recipes/images

[Simone]

Hello Daiane,
Thank you so much for your replies.
I think I will start with linux-imx as you suggested.

Thanks
Simone


-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: angolini at gmail.com [mailto:angolini at gmail.com] Per conto di Daiane Angolini
Inviato: giovedì 27 novembre 2014 12:55
A: Simone
Cc: meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org; Otavio Salvador
Oggetto: Re: [meta-freescale] Status of imx28evk recipes/images

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Simone <cjb.sw.nospam at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I mean, we work also on imx53qsb board and we know that the last 
> working kernel is 2.6.35.3 So, let's redefine the question: which is 
> the latest working kernel for this board?

The latest working kernel for this board is linux-next from kernel.org. It´s not even supported in FSL Community BSP as we only include stable versions (but it´s a perfectly working kernel)

The question you want to do is "What is the latest release from Freescale for imx28evk". And for this question you must go to
freescale.com:
http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=MCIMX28EVKJ&fpsp=1&tab=Design_Tools_Tab#


And, only to make it clear:
http://freescale.github.io/doc/release-notes/1.7/#what-the-project-name-is-not

>
> Thank you, but I'm still missing something.. I suppose that linux-imx 
> is a patched version of the kernel.org one, that include the support 
> the specific freescale (imx) boards. Isn't it?

See the description of each kernel provider here:
http://freescale.github.io/doc/release-notes/1.7/index.html#document-kernel-linux


> If yes, then I should prefer linux-imx because the freescale device 
> drivers should not be included in fslc kernel...
> Another question, how I should compare the imx kernel with the fslc 
> one using the evk board?

I don´t know. It depends on your project.

But, if you don´t know what to use or what you need, start with the default setup, which is virtual/kernel = linux-imx (see mxs-base.inc)

Daiane