[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig

Bob Cochran yocto at mindchasers.com
Wed Nov 12 09:07:34 PST 2014


On 11/12/2014 07:06 AM, zhenhua.luo at freescale.com wrote:
> Bob,
>
> I agree with Otavio's suggestion.


Thank you Otavio and Zhenhua.  Look for two patch resends today or 
tomorrow for what I already sent up but didn't include the linux-qoriq 
recipe patch.

I'm sure you'll let me know if it's not what you're expecting.

If they're acceptable, then I'll start submitting new patches.

Bob





>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Zhenhua
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bob Cochran [mailto:yocto at mindchasers.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 2:53 AM
>> To: Otavio Salvador
>> Cc: Luo Zhenhua-B19537; meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
>> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove
>> Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig
>>
>> On 11/11/2014 06:02 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>> Hello Bob,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Bob Cochran <yocto at mindchasers.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> Please guide me on how I should submit multiple kernel patches for
>>>> linux-qoriq that also require multiple SRC_URI line additions to the
>>>> same linux-qoriq_3.12.bb file in the meta-fsl-ppc layer.
>>>
>>> This is my opinion, so wait Zhenhua to comment on this as well...
>>>
>>> I think it is better to:
>>>
>>> * Have one commit for each patch which detailed explain the issue and
>>> includes the:
>>>
>>>     . kernel patch file (with Upstream-Status: Pending)
>>>     . modification for .bb to include it
>>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the reply Otavio.
>>
>> So if I want to send multiple patches (each patch is a separate email that
>> includes both the kernel patch & a patch for linux-qoriq_3.12.bb), then each
>> patch of linux-qoriq_3.12.bb will depend on any of my previously submitted
>> patches, right?
>>
>> In other words, the SRC_URI in the linux-qoriq_3.12.bb patch will show my
>> prior kernel patch submissions regardless of whether they have been merged /
>> approved.
>>
>> Example: (assume that "configure-T1040-for-FMAN-3VL.patch" was previously
>> submitted but not yet approved / merged) -
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>> file://Fix-CVE-2014-5077-sctp-inherit-auth-capable-on-INIT-collisions.patch
>> \
>>       file://Fix-CVE-2014-5471_CVE-2014-5472.patch \
>>       file://configure-T1040-for-FMAN-V3L.patch   \
>>       +file://remove-Altivec-from-T1040-64-bit-defconfig.patch \
>> "
>> SRCREV = "c29fe1a733308cbe592b3af054a97be1b91cf2dd"
>>
>>
>



More information about the meta-freescale mailing list