[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig
Bob Cochran
yocto at mindchasers.com
Tue Nov 11 10:53:29 PST 2014
On 11/11/2014 06:02 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Bob,
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Bob Cochran <yocto at mindchasers.com> wrote:
>> Please guide me on how I should submit multiple kernel patches for
>> linux-qoriq that also require multiple SRC_URI line additions to the same
>> linux-qoriq_3.12.bb file in the meta-fsl-ppc layer.
>
> This is my opinion, so wait Zhenhua to comment on this as well...
>
> I think it is better to:
>
> * Have one commit for each patch which detailed explain the issue and
> includes the:
>
> . kernel patch file (with Upstream-Status: Pending)
> . modification for .bb to include it
>
Thanks for the reply Otavio.
So if I want to send multiple patches (each patch is a separate email
that includes both the kernel patch & a patch for linux-qoriq_3.12.bb),
then each patch of linux-qoriq_3.12.bb will depend on any of my
previously submitted patches, right?
In other words, the SRC_URI in the linux-qoriq_3.12.bb patch will show
my prior kernel patch submissions regardless of whether they have been
merged / approved.
Example: (assume that "configure-T1040-for-FMAN-3VL.patch" was
previously submitted but not yet approved / merged) -
...
file://Fix-CVE-2014-5077-sctp-inherit-auth-capable-on-INIT-collisions.patch
\
file://Fix-CVE-2014-5471_CVE-2014-5472.patch \
file://configure-T1040-for-FMAN-V3L.patch \
+file://remove-Altivec-from-T1040-64-bit-defconfig.patch \
"
SRCREV = "c29fe1a733308cbe592b3af054a97be1b91cf2dd"
More information about the meta-freescale
mailing list