[meta-freescale] cubox-i machine on dora branch

[Diego Sueiro]

On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br>wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Carlos Rafael Giani <
> dv at pseudoterminal.org>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I wasn't planning on doing that, instead I planned on cubox-i support
> >> being part of a meta-fsl-arm release for the upcoming Yocto 1.7.
> >> But nothing speaks against your patches, at least not from my end. I
> just
> >> never tested it with dora. How much did you have to modify the recipes
> for
> >> dora?
> >
> >
> > I've just checked out the recipes and conf files from master branch to
> > dora-next branch without any modifications.
> > I did not have a chance to make a runtime test, as soon as I get it done
> > I'll keep you informed.
>
> I think we are too close of 1.6 release to go over this. The addition
> of a new board imply several things (more build tests, release notes
> update and like) and we are too close of next version for it to be
> justifiable.
>

I understand your point. Since I must have to use dora branch, it's not
critical to me to maintain it internally.


> Another point is that I doubt it will work. Dora has Vivante GPU
> 4.6.9p12 (from alpha release) while Daisy has Vivante GPU 4.6.9p13
> (from beta release) and the Cubox kernel uses the last. So you'll get
> a segfault in Xorg ;-)


I'm building xmbc-image which technically does not depends on X11.
Crossed fingers.

Regards,

--
*dS
Diego Sueiro

Administrador do Embarcados
www.embarcados.com.br<http://www.embarcados.com.br/?utm_source=assinatura_diego&utm_medium=e-mail&utm_campaign=Assinatura%20Email%20Diego>

/*long live rock 'n roll*/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/attachments/20140326/95a4dcb1/attachment.html>