[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH 1/4] cryptodev-linux/module: use fsl maintained source

[cristian.stoica at freescale.com]

> Is it possible to "rebase" the patches and include them in the recipe?
> In case it is not and we do need a fork it is better to use
> cryptodev-linux-fsl-ppc and cryptodev-module-fsl-ppc recipes to make
> clear it is a fork.
[] 
I've tried a quick rebase and got back all the conflicts I already fixed on the merge. I'd prefer not to do them again, especially since we want to obsolete them with the upstream.
If you have an alternative for the time being, then I'm OK with it.

Cristian S.