[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH v3 00/11] Freescale 3.10.17-1.0.0-beta - part 1

Thu Feb 20 08:34:42 PST 2014

> -----Original Message-----
> From: otavio.salvador at gmail.com [mailto:otavio.salvador at gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Otavio Salvador
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:14 PM
> To: Angolini Daiane-B19406
> Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH v3 00/11] Freescale
> 3.10.17-1.0.0-beta - part 1
> 
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Daiane.Angolini at freescale.com
> <Daiane.Angolini at freescale.com> wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: meta-freescale-bounces at yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-freescale-
> >> bounces at yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Daiane Angolini
> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 10:17 AM
> >> To: Otavio Salvador
> >> Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List
> >> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH v3 00/11]
> >> Freescale 3.10.17-1.0.0-beta - part 1
> >>
> >> On 07-02-2014 10:41, Daiane.Angolini at freescale.com wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: otavio.salvador at gmail.com [mailto:otavio.salvador at gmail.com]
> >> >> On Behalf Of Otavio Salvador
> >> >> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 7:14 PM
> >> >> To: Angolini Daiane-B19406
> >> >> Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List
> >> >> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH v3 00/11]
> >> >> Freescale 3.10.17-1.0.0-beta - part 1
> >> >>
> >> >> Hello Daiane,
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Daiane Angolini
> >> >> <daiane.angolini at freescale.com> wrote:
> >> >>> On 27-01-2014 16:35, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> >>>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Daiane Angolini
> >> >>>> <daiane.angolini at freescale.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On 23-01-2014 23:47, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I did some small fixes that I found during test at O.S. Systems'
> >> >>>>>> autobuilder and I dropped some fixes that were pushed to
> >> >>>>>> master (as you've probably noticed from the e-mail to the mailing
> list).
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I am awaiting people's feedback for the patches as this
> >> >>>>>> upgrades package versions and we should have a better test
> coverage.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Please give a try in the 'master-next' branch and comment in
> >> >>>>>> anything that could be improved in the patches. All comments
> >> >>>>>> are
> >> >> welcome...
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I tested imx-text and vpu integration on imx53qsb and it's OK.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> X11 is up and running on imx53qsb as well.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Tomorrow morning I'm going to test imx28evk and more
> >> >>>>> videos/audios on imx53qsb.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> As soon as I have my test result I let you know.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Awesome; thanks for testing.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I tested imx28evk and imx53qsb, imx-test, and MM packages.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> For imx-test, I think both board had it integrated. So imx-test
> >> >>> is OK
> >> >>>
> >> >>> For MM packages, I tested the following files:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> BigBillBroonzy-BabyPleaseDontGo1.mp3
> >> >>> StarWars_eps1_4.451mbps_30fps_720_L3B2_cut.avi
> >> >>> big_buck_bunny_1080p_h264.mov
> >> >>> terminator3_mpeg4_480x280_24fps_aac_stereo_48khz_1min_47sec.mp4
> >> >>>
> >> >>> All files worked (audio/audio+video+1080pHDMI display) very well
> >> >>> on imx53qsb The mp3 worked very well on imx28evk All movie failed
> >> >>> on imx28evk with "Illegal Instruction". I'm still debugging this.
> >> >>
> >> >> Did you found what is the culprit?
> >> >
> >> > No I haven´t had time to work on this so far. Sorry. No updates.
> >>
> >> I was able to find the commit that introduced the error:
> >>
> >> bb62895 libfslparser: Update to 3.0.9
> >>
> >> So, master is broken now. Reverting bb62895 the error is gone.
> >
> > This error was fixed internally and it´s going to be part of next
> release.
> 
> Great; in this case I think we can merge the VPU patches into master and if
> it proves to work fine into Dora later. As this error is already known in
> Dora as well.
> 
> Do you have any objection?

No, I don´t have objection.

When I tested the next release I used exactly the same recipe. So it would be only 
md5sum and package itself.

I think it may help us with the overall upstream process, as we can merge the VPU 
patchset and eliminate this from our staging area...

Daiane
> 
> --
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
> 