[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 3/5] gst1.0-fsl-plugin: Add Freescale Gstreamer1.0 Plugin for MX6

Eric Nelson eric.nelson at boundarydevices.com
Sun Aug 31 11:02:54 PDT 2014


Hi Lauren,

On 08/30/2014 08:30 PM, Lauren Post wrote:
> In this case we have reasons specific to our test case environments that
> require us to create our own plugin set.
> 

Can you at least tell us what they are?

Presumably these test cases were generated to match a use case,
and users of Carlos's versions might want/need to know.

> 
> *From:*John Weber [mailto:rjohnweber at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, August 30, 2014 6:21 PM
> *To:* Post Lauren-RAA013
> *Cc:* Daiane Angolini; meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org; Carlos Rafael Giani
> *Subject:* Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 3/5]
> gst1.0-fsl-plugin: Add Freescale Gstreamer1.0 Plugin for MX6
> 
>  
> 
> Hi Lauren,
> 
> On Friday, August 29, 2014, Lauren Post <Lauren.Post at freescale.com
> <mailto:Lauren.Post at freescale.com>> wrote:
> 
> Freescale developed their own Gstreamer 1.0 plugins so they are not a
> replacement but another choice that customers can use. 
> 
> Can we get a comparison with what Carlos has done?  Having two sets of
> plugins that perform the same function would be very confusing.   
> 
> Also, I would think Freescale wouldn't bother to spend valuable
> resources on work when they could make use of the community has already
> done. 
> 

Thanks in advance,


Eric


More information about the meta-freescale mailing list