[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] ptpd: add 2.2.0 recipe to support etsec 1588

[Otavio Salvador]

Hello Ting,

On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 10:42 PM, ting.liu at freescale.com
<ting.liu at freescale.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: otavio.salvador at gmail.com [mailto:otavio.salvador at gmail.com] On Behalf
>> Of Otavio Salvador
>> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 8:16 PM
>> To: Liu Ting-B28495
>> Cc: meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
>> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] ptpd: add 2.2.0 recipe to
>> support etsec 1588
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 6:03 AM, ting.liu at freescale.com <ting.liu at freescale.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: otavio.salvador at gmail.com [mailto:otavio.salvador at gmail.com] On
>> >> Behalf Of Otavio Salvador
>> >> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 9:55 PM
>> >> To: Liu Ting-B28495
>> >> Cc: meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
>> >> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] ptpd: add 2.2.0
>> >> recipe to support etsec 1588
>> >>
>> >> This should go to meta-networking, not meta-fsl-ppc.
>> >
>> > mete-openembedded/meta-networking has latest 2.3.0 ptpd. There is a
>> > patch which was based on
>> > 2.2.0 for qoriq boards, so keep a copy in meta-fsl-ppc currently.
>>
>> Why not use 2.3.0?
>
> What was tested in sdk 1.6 is 2.2.0, and there is a patch that can't be
> applied on latest 2.3.0. . Developers are trying to upstream it.

I think the best is to get the patch working with 2.3.0 and use this
one. We shouldn't put non-BSP stuff in meta-fsl-ppc.

In fact the patch shouldn't even be here as a bbappend, except if it
has machine specific code, but in the original recipe.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750