[meta-freescale] [ANN] FSL Test Plan Announcement 1.6

[Daiane.Angolini at freescale.com]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexandre Belloni [mailto:alexandre.belloni at free-electrons.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 7:54 PM
> To: Angolini Daiane-B19406
> Cc: meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [ANN] FSL Test Plan Announcement 1.6
> 
> Hi Daiane,
> 
> On 04/04/2014 at 17:57:26 +0000, Daiane.Angolini at freescale.com wrote :
> > The goal test plan for this release is:
> >
> > MUST HAVE:
> > * all 29 boards MUST reach the user space prompt
> > * all i.MX6 boards MUST have running accelerated
> >     * x11
> >     * framebuffer
> >     * wayland
> >     * directfb
> > * all i.MX6 boards MUST have GPU and VPU support for both SFP and HFP
> > * all 29 boards MUST play at least one movie
> 
> I'm not sure it is worth playing movie on the few boards that don't have a
> screen ;)

Humm, It´s something that I´m always /not absolutely sure/.

But, why would a board with a multimemdia chip not play a movie of have a "screen"

In our current board list, only vybrid is not supposed to be "multimedia chip"

And, wandboard, for example, does not have an screen until you plug HDMI.

And don´t forget imx28/imx233, the chip does not have VPU, but I always work to get playback working on it.

So, I´m think say /all boards must play at least one movie/ is not that wrong. But of course I can add "when applicable"

> 
> > * all 29 boards MUST encode at least one kind of movie
> 
> Same here, I don't have any board able to capture video...
> I don't have any audio out either.

Here I agree that this should be SHOULD not MUST. Or add a "when applicable".

In your opinion, what would be a better Test Goals? Would you mind to re-write mine and to share it?


Daiane
> 
> > * all 29 boards MUST have minimal kernel defconfig enabled by default
> > (USB/SDcard/aplay)
> 
> --
> Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
>