[meta-freescale] Problem with image types

[Gary Thomas]

On 2013-10-11 10:13, Eric Bénard wrote:
> Le Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:37:48 -0600,
> Gary Thomas <gary at mlbassoc.com> a écrit :
>
>> On 2013-10-11 09:35, Eric Bénard wrote:
>>> Le Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:52:30 -0600,
>>> Gary Thomas <gary at mlbassoc.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> On 2013-10-11 08:39, Chris Larson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Gary Thomas <gary at mlbassoc.com <mailto:gary at mlbassoc.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>       I'm using image_types_fsl from meta-fsl-arm and running into
>>>>>       some issues.  If I set
>>>>>          IMAGE_FSTYPES="tar.bz2 ext3 sdcard"
>>>>>          IMAGE_CLASSES="image_types_fsl"
>>>>>       I only end up with .ext3 and .sdcard images - no .tar.bz2.
>>>>>       If I use the default
>>>>>          IMAGE_CLASSES="image_types"
>>>>>       then I get .tar.bz2 but no .sdcard
>>>>>
>>>>>       How can I have them all at once?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that IMAGE_CLASSES is plural, not singular :)
>>>>>
>>>>> IMAGE_CLASSES = "image_types image_types_fsl", presumably.
>>>>
>>>> When I tried that, I got the same results as just IMAGE_CLASSES="image_types"
>>>> Also, meta-fsl-arm/classes/image_types_fsl.bbclass inherits "image_types" so
>>>> I don't think it should be necessary to list them both.
>>>>
>>> don't you have a IMAGE_FSTYPES="ext3 sdcard" hardcoded somewhere in
>>> your machine file ?
>>
>> No, as seen above, IMAGE_FSTYPES="tar.bz2 ext3 sdcard"
>>
> bitbake yourimage -e may help to understand how IMAGE_FSTYPES is built.

I had already done this - that's where the quoted values are from.  IMAGE_FSTYPES
definitely contains all three types, but only .ext3 and .sdcard are being
built if I use image_types_fsl.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------