[meta-freescale] Problem with image types

Eric Bénard eric at eukrea.com
Fri Oct 11 09:13:08 PDT 2013


Le Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:37:48 -0600,
Gary Thomas <gary at mlbassoc.com> a écrit :

> On 2013-10-11 09:35, Eric Bénard wrote:
> > Le Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:52:30 -0600,
> > Gary Thomas <gary at mlbassoc.com> a écrit :
> >
> >> On 2013-10-11 08:39, Chris Larson wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Gary Thomas <gary at mlbassoc.com <mailto:gary at mlbassoc.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>      I'm using image_types_fsl from meta-fsl-arm and running into
> >>>      some issues.  If I set
> >>>         IMAGE_FSTYPES="tar.bz2 ext3 sdcard"
> >>>         IMAGE_CLASSES="image_types_fsl"
> >>>      I only end up with .ext3 and .sdcard images - no .tar.bz2.
> >>>      If I use the default
> >>>         IMAGE_CLASSES="image_types"
> >>>      then I get .tar.bz2 but no .sdcard
> >>>
> >>>      How can I have them all at once?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Note that IMAGE_CLASSES is plural, not singular :)
> >>>
> >>> IMAGE_CLASSES = "image_types image_types_fsl", presumably.
> >>
> >> When I tried that, I got the same results as just IMAGE_CLASSES="image_types"
> >> Also, meta-fsl-arm/classes/image_types_fsl.bbclass inherits "image_types" so
> >> I don't think it should be necessary to list them both.
> >>
> > don't you have a IMAGE_FSTYPES="ext3 sdcard" hardcoded somewhere in
> > your machine file ?
> 
> No, as seen above, IMAGE_FSTYPES="tar.bz2 ext3 sdcard"
> 
bitbake yourimage -e may help to understand how IMAGE_FSTYPES is built.

Eric



More information about the meta-freescale mailing list