[meta-freescale] Issues using meta-freescale i.MX6 vs LTIB ?

Daiane Angolini daiane.angolini at freescale.com
Wed Oct 2 06:37:17 PDT 2013


On 10/02/2013 10:12 AM, Alex J Lennon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to qualify a decision to use Yocto / meta-freescale for an
> upcoming
> i.MX6 board variant (based on the Sabre reference) instead of using the
> officially supported release based on LTIB.
>
> My preference is strongly for the Yocto/OpenEmbedded build environment,
> for various reasons, but I understand that the Freescale i.MX6 BSP is not
> officially supported at this time.
>
> Knowing the experience and activity levels of the people working via these
> lists, I suspect that meta-freescale is by now significantly ahead of
> the current
> release of LTIB.
>
> That said I wonder if there are any known issues with using meta-freescale
> which might give me pause, and cause me to use LTIB at this time?

You can see all current known issues here
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=meta-fsl-arm&list_id=105732

As you may know, the last LTIB release from Freescale was 3.0.35_4.1.0.

And, as already said in ML, next release 3.10.9_1.0.0 will be Yocto

;-)


>
> Thanks for your advice,
>
> Alex Lennon
> Director
> Dynamic Devices Ltd
>
> _______________________________________________
> meta-freescale mailing list
> meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
>


-- 
Daiane




More information about the meta-freescale mailing list