[meta-freescale] [PATCH v4 3/3] amd-gpu-bin-mx51: new recipe

[Eric Bénard]

Hi Javier,

Le Thu, 30 May 2013 11:49:44 +0200,
Javier Viguera <javier.viguera at digi.com> a écrit :
> On 29/05/13 20:01, Eric Bénard wrote:
> > diff --git a/recipes-graphics/amd-gpu-x11-bin/amd-gpu-bin-mx51_11.09.01.bb b/recipes-graphics/amd-gpu-x11-bin/amd-gpu-bin-mx51_11.09.01.bb
> > +COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(mx5)"
> 
> > diff --git a/recipes-graphics/amd-gpu-x11-bin/amd-gpu-x11-bin-mx51_11.09.01.bb b/recipes-graphics/amd-gpu-x11-bin/amd-gpu-x11-bin-mx51_11.09.01.bb
> >   COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'x11', '(mx5)', '', d)}"
> 
> I'm still learning yocto/openembedded so bear with me if all the
> following does not make sense, but is this correct?
> 
> When DISTRO_FEATURES contains x11, *both* packages will have:
> 
> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(mx5)"
> 
> so both will be available.
> 
> When DISTRO_FEATURES does *NOT* contain x11, then:
> 
> amd-gpu-bin-mx51:     COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(mx5)"
> amd-gpu-x11-bin-mx51: COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = ""
> 
> But in this case if i have not misunderstood the semantics of
> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE both will be again available as an empty
> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE means that it's available.
> 
after some testings I confirm you are right.

Eric