[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH] qt5: add mx5 and mx6 support

[Otavio Salvador]

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Eric Bénard <eric at eukrea.com> wrote:

> Le Fri, 31 May 2013 12:00:08 -0300,
> Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br> a écrit :
>
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Eric Bénard <eric at eukrea.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Le Fri, 31 May 2013 10:18:44 -0300,
> > > Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br> a écrit :
> > >
> > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Eric Bénard <eric at eukrea.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > - this allow to build qt5 with OpenGL ES support for i.MX5 and
> i.MX6
> > > > > - tested on i.MX51, i.MX53 and i.MX6Q
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard <eric at eukrea.com>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >  recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase/mx5/qeglfshooks_imx5.cpp |  105
> > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase_5.0.2.bbappend           |   68
> +++++++++++++++
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > Thinking more about it, I think we should put these inside a meta-qt5
> > > > directory so we know what will be 'included'. Otherwse we may need to
> > > pick
> > > > every file depending on each layer and it might be difficult to
> > > understand
> > > > what is in use and what is not.
> > > >
> > > please apply as is and create a patch on top of it to achieve the
> > > organization you prefer.
> > >
> >
> > No reason to apply one patch which we know that needs rework.
> >
> > Do you agree with my argument?
> >
> no ;-)
>

Well; it would be easier if you could explain why. Do you mind to elaborate
it a little more?

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/attachments/20130531/cb8eacfe/attachment.html>