[meta-freescale] Any interest in a Yocto / Freescale repo?
Koen Kooi
koen at dominion.thruhere.net
Tue Jun 11 07:57:22 PDT 2013
Op 10 jun. 2013, om 13:49 heeft Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br> het volgende geschreven:
> Hello,
>
> [ Adding Koen in Cc ]
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Eric Bénard <eric at eukrea.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le Sun, 9 Jun 2013 22:42:45 -0400,
> Donavan Stanley <donavan.stanley at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > I originally extended this offer in the Wandboard Google group. Fabio
> > Estevam asked me to join and propose it here.
> >
> > Having spent a while working with Yocto under a VM I decided to devote a
> > full node to BitBake builds. After doing a bitbake world in less time than
> > my VM built fsl-image-gui I thought a package repository might be useful to
> > the Freescale community. I'm happy to leave this node devoted to builds
> > and set up a CI system to build and publish to one of my web facing
> > machines.
> >
> > So if folks think it would add value then what repo type? What package
> > format(s)?
>
> maybe adding meta-fsl-* to Angstrom would fill that need of a binary
> package repository and avoid to maintain a fsl centric package
> repository :
> http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/
> http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/repo/
>
> I also agree here. I don't think it is worth maintaining a specific public repository as it is not as simply as it appears from first look. Angstrom does a great job on this and looks as the right place to make it.
>
> Koen, are you open for it? In case if a positive answer, what is need to be done?
Send a patch against the setup-scripts repo and let me know which machines you need it for.
More information about the meta-freescale
mailing list